Re: 3.6 branch and release

It's fixed in 00b0e039656a19ae9b6e013c90d49904f322301e, thanks to Matt. So
we're good - as far as I know.


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Venkatesh Srinivas <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:40 AM, John Marino <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On 11/5/2013 08:15, John Marino wrote:
> >> On 11/5/2013 04:51, Justin Sherrill wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John Marino <[email protected]
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     Are you tracking any must-fixes?
> >>>     Davshao posted this on http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2597 :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You wrote in that followup that you weren't able to duplicate it, and
> >>> I'd think you'd encounter it a thousand times over with poudriere
> >>> builds.  Did it happen for you?
> >>
> >> The blade Poudriere doesn't use UFS, only tmpfs and hammer.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     Are there others?
> >>>     Would the existence of others affect the branch decision?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> There's no pending problems that I'm aware of.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, except this one.
> >> John
> >
> >
> > The issue is real.
> > I just reproduced it two times out of two attempts on i386 + UFS.
> > It tried to dump but the machine rebooted before the dump finished.
> > This is a deal-breaker for Release in my opinion as well.
> > John
>
> Can you post a copy of objdump -d of the kernel that paniced to the
> bug tracker? vn_syncer_add() was either passed a null vp or a vnode w/
> a null mount in this bug.
>
> -- vs;
>