Re: Soliciting opinions on dsched removal
Markus Pfeiffer <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Nov 2015 00:09:36 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 05:03:33PM -0500, Alex Hornung wrote: > On 08/11/2015 10:38, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > The basic problem is that heavy use of dsched (the disk scheduler) has > > caused crashes and lockups ever since dsched went into the tree, and is > > still causing crashes and lockups today. Several people have tried to > > bandaid it but honestly I think the only correct solution is to remove it > > and then start over from scratch at some future date with a better design. > > > > So I would like to remove it, and I am soliciting opinions on that. > I'm all for it. I am completely with Alex on this one, in particular the comments about SSD, and probably even more so NVMe warrant changing the approach to IO scheduling. In particular simplifying the CAM interface seems worth a shot. Not that I want to stop anyone from trying... Cheers, Markus
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWP+Q8AAoJEIh/XXHeBJ1SIOgP/19KhkiNl4L6b41m2cS/A0Vd B4PGt4U/bfQyD0T2J9pDXKdxTQnf/G2frO/aEvaShfss7z3KtQGINnSoqx99iudQ gxpmZbiEXAfrvgoJOqarL0x8MAUZAtibTm7KxpAgJJ9/mXfLCznDIbi5dA/XawZN fi1m4cIqoCqarAjfi5mYGOZFhKXjZ4JbvYL1UnPK+MY4vbpoHSc8O8g0tcMPFd4L oXc710B2sFNysqwLyG3iLpoFr9cMaDqN7eXKJsoEjGya583iZvCgJpj6tKJ0bbKu I3h2wzVKMXWMzdhBybqMtLM4/G7F8MvWr1eBu11w7l3QPQ7RoElzNxjhCPdnxNQB cFDR5jBK0e3ejEp+YigYC6rSLPpdWvzcwvUSL8q2YDKJpMAZ+RXSIiGApZwgkXZF fV8et5zqP86ecMhWLycOeFb1rIGDc1BnNUeoVB0gRaHrnJ6shAVF94A7ozddL4aU 6FnagUq6ql1b0RWD4v9XzpB802JGvbLDMdnqlgbPhRkUM+TKTRUdtCxObHSuPf8F adTlsiAZvKb8KBLwwQYbPI4q4lH3DhHDFyeBH78VqaTr6cjBw+GpfQv14uXCI7oP 4wPmq0W2ccwed6u6ORXInZx2nYXcpXHk3Iqw+9hV7cCUZ4XZaAV+lcWWsBfIOoyC 102pSHWt4YEPSazSL1Pa =d3LY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----