Re: Objections to converting bsd-family-tree to a dot file
Warner Losh <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:58:41 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.general,gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANCZdfoJgsOCdowo3tnpaaTqTSP98cyx2-H4-bi2Mm5FKieDWw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been attempting to maintain bsd-family-tree (available as > share/misc/bsd-family-tree) as a plain text file across 3 different > operating systems: NetBSD, DragonFly, and FreeBSD. > > It has to be maintained by hand, and can't be parsed to do anything > more useful (like turn it into an image). In addition, formatting > differences between the different projects have led to minor > differenes that are difficult to merge. > > I'd like to turn this into into a dot file > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOT_(graph_description_language)) which > is a more natural format for a graph. > > Any objections? It isn't used for much beyond documentation so > changing the format isn't expected to cause any negative effects. > Show Me The Money! That is, show me how it will be rendered in the new format and we can talk. A dot format would definitely be useful in addition to what we have now (which includes release dates with useful sources). My concern is that it will render a useless hodgepodge that obscures the main narrative. Warner _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"