Re: NAND review
Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.ecos.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:27:05AM +0200, Simon Kallweit wrote:
> Hi there
>
> * Ross's code uses the directory 'io/nand' for the NAND framework and
> adds the NAND flash device drivers in 'devs/nand'. This is contrary to
> what was discussed on the mailing list a few months ago:
>
> http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2008-09/msg00172.html
>
> I still think that the naming scheme by Ross (and what Rutger originally
> intended to do) is the better approach. Because when we mix the flash
> chip drivers for NOR and NAND chips in one directory (devs/flash) it's
> rather easy to get confused.
At the time we discussed this i did not have that strong an
opinion. And i think i was the only person who did express an
opinion. I would not complain about this naming scheme if that is what
people want.
Andrew