Re: Re: NAND review

Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:17:58 +0100
>> From: John Dallaway <[email protected]>
>> To: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>
>> CC: eCos Maintainers <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: NAND & YAFFS
>>
>> Have you been able to form a view on the relative merits of the VU
>> Amsterdam and eCosCentric implementations so far? Just wanting to ensure
>> that this process is not stalled for any reason...
>>
>> John Dallaway
>>     
>
>   
<snip>

> There was an email from Rutger that Televic are willing to contribute
> their drivers for an AT91SAM9260 based board. If that happens, it
> would mean two real implementations for Rutgers, vs one for Ross.
>
>   
Indeed, we would like to contribute, but it takes time...
Stijn will try to do the contribution, I will get the FSF copyright 
assignment (but the site is down today..).

Kind regards,
Jürgen

<snip>
>          Andrew
>