Re: Should we add compiler warnings to diag_sprintf & diag_vsprintf ?

Rutger Hofman wrote:
> Chris Holgate wrote:
>> I've just had to add support for diag_vsnprintf to diag.h as part of
>> writing some logging code.  We all know that sprintf, vsprintf and their
>>  evil unchecked spawn are the source of lots of buffer overflow bugs -
>> so while I'm prepping a patch for this change is it worth adding
>> compiler warning attributes to diag_sprintf and diag_vsprintf to help
>> 'discourage' their use?
> 
> That would collide with -Werror -- an option I happen to like a lot. 
> Besides, my guess is that the vsnprintf functions will be called through 
> some printf-style variadic function, and the compiler can verify 
> arguments there.

Ach, I misunderstood. You want to discourage diag_sprintf and 
diag_vsprintf in favour of diag_vsnprintf. I fully agree here.

Rutger