Re: NAND technical review

Jonathan Larmour <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:55:29 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.os.ecos.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

JÃ¼rgen Lambrecht wrote:
> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>> JÃ¼rgen Lambrecht wrote:
[snip]
>>> We have it very well tested, amongst others
[snip]
>>
>> That's extremely useful to know, thanks! But a couple of further 
>> questions
>> on this: (1) Did any bad blocks show up at any point? (2) Were you 
>> using a bad
>> block table? (3) Presumably there were factory-marked bad blocks on some?
> 
> (3) Yes, there are almost always factory-marked bad blocks.
> (2) yes
> (1)Yes, certainly! We have from time to time bad blocks, and they are 
> handled correctly.

That's great to know, especially (1), thanks!

Jifl
-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine