Re: lwip 1.3.1 testing

Hi Simon

Simon Kallweit wrote:

> John Dallaway wrote:
> 
>> Excellent. I would like to push through with final review and get your
>> lwIP port checked in to CVS, replacing the existing lwIP 1.1.1 port. Is
>> lwip-20091027.tar.gz still current or do you have further changes?
>> Should I be comparing your package with the upstream lwIP 1.3.1 sources
>> or is it now closer to lwIP 1.3.2 RC1?
> 
> Sorry for the late answer, I have been on holidays. I think we should
> wait a few days for the lwIP 1.3.2 release. I'll merge the changes and
> do a few tests so we have a good initial version for a CVS checkin. It
> seems that some work has been done on the PPP code as well. I'll see how
> it fits with my current port.

I've just noticed a new tarball lwip-20091224.tar.gz on your site. Were
you intending to do any further work on this in the immediate future or
shall we work towards an initial check-in of your port based on this
tarball?

John Dallaway
eCos maintainer