Re: NAND technical review

On 12/11/2010 08:18 PM, John Dallaway wrote:
> Hi Jifl
>
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:03:02 +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>
>> I think I really have to get some comparative measurements on code size
>> and performance at least. It's tricky when there is no common hardware.
>> Not even a common architecture (given Jurgen's SAM9260 port isn't
>> public). And no common chip even then. I think that unless someone is
>> willing to port one or other to a common piece of hardware, then the
>> only recourse is the synthetic target.
>>
>> I've now built both implementations and run all tests successfully on
>> synth for both. Now I "just" need to finish porting rwbenchmark.c to (R).
>
> Do you see any opportunity to complete this review in the near future?
>
> John Dallaway

Our project, RFID Guardian, has unexpectedly be cut out of funding. The 
project is now in the fridge until we find new funding, and that might 
take an arbitrarily long time. I am winding up loose ends in the 
software right now, and I expect I will be assigned as research 
programmer to some other project within the Computer Systems Group of 
the VU Amsterdam. I don't know for sure, but my expectation is that I 
will not be able to do more than bug fixes for my NAND package.

Well, this kind-a breaks any promises I made regarding 
improvements/performance hacks to the package, and although I feel bad 
about that, there is some mitigation in the fact that more than a year 
has passed since in complete silence.

Rutger Hofman
VU Amsterdam