RE: advocacy/188031: Contradictions between the FAQ and the Handbook

Andrew Moseman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.advocacy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The following reply was made to PR advocacy/188031; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Moseman <[email protected]>
To: Kim Lesmer <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
	<[email protected]>
Cc:  
Subject: RE: advocacy/188031: Contradictions between the FAQ and the Handbook
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:32:55 +0000

 Good catch Kim,
 
 Another suggestion would be to link the FAQ to the hand book or vice versa =
 and manage only one definition.
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-freebsd-advocacy@fre=
 ebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kim Lesmer
 Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 9:11 AM
 To: [email protected]
 Subject: advocacy/188031: Contradictions between the FAQ and the Handbook
 
 
 >Number:         188031
 >Category:       advocacy
 >Synopsis:       Contradictions between the FAQ and the Handbook
 >Confidential:   no
 >Severity:       non-critical
 >Priority:       low
 >Responsible:    freebsd-advocacy
 >State:          open
 >Quarter:       =20
 >Keywords:      =20
 >Date-Required:
 >Class:          doc-bug
 >Submitter-Id:   current-users
 >Arrival-Date:   Fri Mar 28 13:20:00 UTC 2014
 >Closed-Date:
 >Last-Modified:
 >Originator:     Kim Lesmer
 >Release:        10
 >Organization:
 >Environment:
 >Description:
 On the FAQ here: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/introduction.html
 
 It says, when explaining the different releases:
 
 "Briefly, -STABLE is aimed at the ISP, corporate user, or any user who want=
 s stability and a minimal number of changes compared to the new (and possib=
 ly unstable) features of the latest -CURRENT snapshot."
 
 This is highly contradictory to the information provided several places in =
 the Hanbook.
 
 For example:
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/current-stable.html
 
 "This is still a development branch and, at any given time, the sources for=
  FreeBSD-STABLE may or may not be suitable for general use. It is simply an=
 other engineering development track, not a resource for end-users."
 
 
 >How-To-Repeat:
 
 >Fix:
 I think having a FAQ section outside of the Handbook is a problem. It would=
  be better, easier to keep track of things, if the FAQ is moved to the Hand=
 book and then the above information corrected.
 
 >Release-Note:
 >Audit-Trail:
 >Unformatted:
 _______________________________________________
 [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/=
 listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
 
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.