Re: CoC does not help in benchmarks

Which ones left, exactly?

Warner

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Erich Dollansky <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> do you think that this will bring back programmers?
>
> Erich
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 12:43:10 -0600
> Warner Losh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The plan is to do another revision, this time in public. We've
> > already done the first round of data collection and have data to
> > inform the revisions. Now that core election is done, progress can be
> > made.
> >
> > Replying point by point to this misleading and slanted assessment is
> > not wothwhile.
> >
> > Warner
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 12:22 PM Julian H. Stacey <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > here are the consequences of putting a CoC up high on the
> > > > priority list:
> > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=windows-
> freebsd112-8linux&num=1
> > >
> > > FreeBSD performance is really bad on some comparisons there.
> > >
> > > > Focusing on software would have made FreeBSD do better.
> > >
> > > Yes, The new COC imposition distracted from coding:
> > >   The COC hi-jack replacement promoted by FreeBSD Foundation, was
> > >   contentious, incompetently phrased in places, imposed without
> > >   prior debate, enforced by a few commiters, wasted peoples time &
> > >   caused annoyance.  Aside from the content, the process also
> > >   deserves reprimand. There were complaints to core@.  Core
> > > secretary wrote me that review was in progress.  Nothing long since.
> > >
> > > The hijacked COC needs at least core@ review.
> > > Discussion before would have been better.
> > >
> > > I'd at least suggest append:
> > >   "No one may edit this COC, without prior consent of core@"
> > >
> > > As the promoting commiters abused due process, stifled debate, &
> > > their hijacked COC foists their own "Code of Conduct Committee" &
> > > taht will deny most appeals, a sceptical eye seems appropriate ;-)
> > >
> > > Refs:
> > > https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html
> > > "This Code of Conduct is based on the example policy from the Geek
> > > Feminism wiki."
> > >
> > >
> > > https://web.archive.org/web/20170701000000*/www.freebsd.
> org/internal/code-of-conduct.html
> > >
> > > https://web.archive.org/web/20170824113511/www.freebsd.
> org/internal/code-of-conduct.html
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Julian
> > > --
> > > Julian Stacey, Computer Consultant, Systems Engineer, BSD Linux
> > > Unix, Munich
> > >  Brexit Referendum stole 3.7 million votes inc. 700,000 from
> > > British in EU. UK Goverment lies it's democratic in Article 50
> > > paragraph 3 of letter to EU.
> > >                         http://exitbrexit.uk
> > >
> > >
>
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"