Re: FreeBSD awk behavior change proposal

"Rodney W. Grimes" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.architechture
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Greetings,
> 
> I've posted  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31114 which eliminates the last
> delta we have from upstream one-true-awk. This delta has basically been
> rejected by upstream as being a really bad idea. Let me give some
> background.
> 
> In 2005, FreeBSD changed one-true-awk to honor the locale's collating order.
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.bin/awk/b.c.diff?annotate=146322&pathrev=201988
> This was billed as a temporary patch. It was also compatible with
> the then-current behavior of gawk. That temporary patch has lasted 16
> years now.
> 
> However, IEEE Std 1003.1-2008 changed the behaivor of ranges in regular
> expressions outside of the "C" and "POSIX" locales to be undefined.
> 
> Starting in 2011, gawk 4.0 stopped using the locale for the range
> regular expressions and used the traditional behavior only. The
> maintainer had grown weary of answering why '[A-Z]' would sometimes
> match lower-case expressions. The details about are explained here:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/html_node/Ranges-and-Locales.html
> 
> To restore compatibility with other implementaitons of awk, revert this
> patch. FreeBSD is the odd-system out. It also has the nice side effect
> of eliminating the last of our differences with upstream one-true-awk.
> 
> I'd like to commit the change at least to -current. Ideally, I'd like to MFC
> the change. I believe better compatibility with gawk and other awk
> implementations justifies this change in behavior because the current
> behavior is outside the mainstream enough to be considered a bug.
> 
> I'd like to solicit input before I do this, however.

My only concern on this is does anything in the ports system get
tickled by this change, I know its a pita, but maybe have an exp
run done?  I reviewed and accepted the differential, and by examination
I do not see how this could cause an issue now, so Meh give it a long
back in -current and things should be ok.

> Warner
-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.