Re: Style(9): Allow // comments

Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.architechture
Organization The FreeBSD Project
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday, 26 July 2022 at 21:52:33 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:13 PM Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 26 July 2022 at 15:03:34 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> So, is it time to allow C++ comments? I think so.
>>>
>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35960
>>>
>>> Comments about how I said it? In the review.
>>> Comments on whether or not we should do it? Reply here.
>>
>> Then we have two different comment styles, and there's no obvious
>> (to me) reason why we need that.
>
> Why not?

I find /* ... */  perfectly adequate.  As I say, it's my viewpoint.

>> What would bde have said?
>
> Unsure. He'd have an analysis that had 10 or so salient points, 5 of
> which nobody else has thought of. :).

Heh.  That sounds right.

Greg
--
Sent from my desktop computer.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
This message is digitally signed.  If your Microsoft mail program
reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA.php
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 163 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAmLgukgACgkQIubykFB6QiPUYgCfbspaySIJwMMz+263zYF8Bgk4
vNsAnA/X/w3ecb8ipsGlmkyDpzZxk8Qu
=7asy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.