Re: Stlye(9) strengthen statements on not using K&R function definitions

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:31:17AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Greetings
> 
> I've posted a review https://reviews.freebsd.org/D35945 which strengths
> statements about K&R definitions and declarations: don't use them. Most of
> the K&R code has been removed from the tree (ufs being the last straggler).
> Future versions of the C standard will remove the K&R definitions and
> declaration syntax. clang 15 will whine about this construct.
> 
> The time is ripe to move to language that suggests an outright prohibition.
> 
> Comments about language? Make them in phabricator.
> Comments about the idea? Reply here

FYI: I did notice the other day that less(1) strictly uses K&R.

-- 
Shawn Webb
Cofounder / Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

https://git.hardenedbsd.org/hardenedbsd/pubkeys/-/raw/master/Shawn_Webb/03A4CBEBB82EA5A67D9F3853FF2E67A277F8E1FA.pub.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEA6TL67gupaZ9nzhT/y5nonf44foFAmMp3lIACgkQ/y5nonf4
4fqSSBAAiqr4euJb6XE8m5tp13ma8N9+dDNNe8ISE+27LUpKMA3HwSLROsCO1tHN
3hZnjAUwIWHVzrY4KRBYVK47v+CQtY/a77fem21rfwWElHNkcS2lv5ylKfic/XYj
SodE5OW4GScbY0M9zYjh7k5ITIc+Hpo8w4G90e9WJZryEfwrW85aEuF5wiQ3qVCl
H9Uh1t/cunRAdormwi/bmdHG/DV3N7PRa5LNduxJ+4bC13uN63aKsXzwAUKRvC2x
CGntVV/fTCBTjyMAgM8JqGl0zoJ+l40H0+G3B+uUrNqq3k1IHTrSrTsR42eCPNVX
8fhhUQoN4j7GkGrvWqb4R1TweYFl2ImpJkqJYQCYj8mshMTlfXDtP5JiOjEAQB/i
ZizVgfqEC0FkyvjwEU3zD2Wna1dNb9dUaerks3YC22r9qCemu1b4FFReUvyO57/y
zkPPr/4ch+4KNA9SXF+URVIFAj2PZ+Q8akyPt+LgyO7AivnuoZTyrItDUGV68QHD
dPHlM9BebNzkNF13317aT+y/QS8pjbLJ+uZSeXCKBv6SunCLhNsvjUR0G3kTduZq
B8r+Gi9Xe7+FqJ5norY8YE0QjDkUw+7eFf2z9Q2xC5Ymkv00VhrPKFH2SyJykL8U
Xq6fqFpEGJ+B17HIs0CCHgIsAoB5ryAXD0E86yuVVizQnw3Dj0c=
=n9mf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----