Re: orch(1) for tty testing

Warner Losh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.architechture
Message-ID <CANCZdfqe+nu=3b+acyAvtaDcvu3vHfEPOVaFqKWTfRpSARUJUg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:55 PM Kyle Evans <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I wrote a tool for tty testing w/ lua scripts, inspired by expect(1) and
> with some similarities, but explicitly without the goal of trying to be
> compatible:
>
> https://git.kevans.dev/kevans/orch
>
> An example of its use is here:
>
> https://git.kevans.dev/kevans/tty-tests/src/branch/main/test_canon.orch
>
> Each spawn() creates a new pts(4) and allows us to drive I/O to the
> process with write/match statements.  I have one or two tests written
> with it so far and the end result is, IMO, much less painful looking and
> less error prone than the equivalent in C.
>
> It still needs a bit of polish (e.g., improved diagnostics when a match
> fails), but I'd like to consider importing this somewhere for use in the
> near future for tty testing given how much it simplifies.  I can push it
> to ports, but we have a private liblua in base so it could be built and
> banished off into, e.g., /usr/tests/sys/kern/tty/, to make my life just
> a tad easier re: getting these to run in CI.  It's pretty lightweight;
> the orch binary on my amd64 system clocks in at ~27K, and orch.lua at 13K.
>
> Any objections to importing this new tool into /usr/tests or maybe even
> /usr/libexec?
>

Seems useful enough to include.  For more than just testing...

Warner
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.