Re: RFC: linking with --no-undefined-version

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:35:19PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote:
> As of LLVM 16, lld default to --no-undefined-version which means that if
> a symbol is listed in the symbol version map it must be present or lld
> will fail to link.  This is good because it prevents that accidental loss
> of symbols which breaks our ABI compatibility.  Unfortunately, it's
> somewhat complicating because our symbol version maps may vary
> per-architecture or based on options.  As a result we added
> --undefined-version to LDFLAGS.
> 

Just to be clear, does this extend into /usr/ports?  I only have 3020 *.so  
in /usr/local/lib.  I can image that some software package may have
missing symbols.

-- 
Steve