Re: That's how (why) BSD is dying (Was: BPF64)
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers,gmane.os.freebsd.architechture,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vadim Goncharov writes: > Because - and I've written that from the beginning - wrong architecture > will cost too much if your code already exists, than if fixed before > that. So I've received worthy feedback describing problems; not that > were good solutions yet, though... And when people do not agree with your proposed architecture "FreeBSD is dying!!!1!!" ? > Not you. FreeBSD already had precedent when already written and > committed code framework for device sensors was removed: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2007-October/082398.html > and that happened by exactly the same person with similar tone (not you). Yes, I will resist all bad architecture. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.