Re: What's the plan for powerpc64 in FreeBSD 16
Mark Millard <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Nov 2025 21:30:11 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.architechture |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> wrote on Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 22:58:38 UTC : > . . . > > But like, I also don't buy the "kill it" argument for some stuff when > we actually have users and interest, > and maybe if we didn't treat things as a "crappy platform" or "I hate > working on this" - see how > the FreeBSD developer community has treated the Raspberry Pi platforms > as an example - we wouldn't > keep hitting these issues. > > . . . I've been trying to parse this and it seem to be a specification that folks should volunteer differently than they have after the last highly active developers/maintainers backed off for the RPi*'s, just because there would be users interested in the results. (Note: I'm aware of efforts for the RPi5 beyond the partial EDK2 draft that I use as a context for FreeBSD, but that is over-specific to the overall structure of the point above.) But any lack of unpaid folks with the relevant skills and background knowledge, time and interest --that look forward to volunteering-- looks to be a sufficient reason to drop support for any platform for FreeBSD. A ready supply of users may be necessary for support to be reasonable --but is far from sufficient for support to be reasonable. Such is the nature of volunteer development/maintenance efforts. The last time I contributed to the RPi* kernel code it was to eliminate the early boot crashes with more modern RPi* .dtb files at the time. It took me something like 8 months to identify the 2 or so relevant source code lines and specify an approximately appropriate textual change that someone committed with a relevant better-alternative value used. I fail the "relevant skills and background knowledge" aspect on any reasonable timescale, even if the other aspects had no issues. (But there are such issues as well.) I will happily continue to use some RPi*'s via FreeBSD while I can. But I'm not going to object to other's choices about their activities --or to FreeBSD avoiding accumulated technical debt that can result. The same would be true if I still had access to working big endian powerpc64 or big endian 32 bit powerpc (old PowerMacs at the time). (I've never had access to any little endian powerpc*.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com