Re: lpd: the thin edge of the wedge?

Marco Moock <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:31:31 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.architechture
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--Sig_/jBL=wJsvTFBbgroPRPlLf7B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 26.02.2026 03:26 "Julian H. Stacey" <[email protected]> wrote:

> * Example: As a user of lpr & lpd since UCB BSD 4.2. ~ 1986
> (Symmetric 375 : Jolitz) Behind a firewall I don't need security from
> lpd, & no wish to loose time adopting CUPS, (though considered while
> searching for drivers). =20

And that is already one of the wrong thoughts: If the commands have
security issues, they can be used on the machine itself. Certain
machines exist with multiple users. You do not want them to be able to
abuse it and maybe get root privileges.

Such an issue must be fixed.

--=20
kind regards
Marco

Send spam to [email protected]

--Sig_/jBL=wJsvTFBbgroPRPlLf7B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WjoW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/jBL=wJsvTFBbgroPRPlLf7B--