Re: per-user send-pr defaults: ~/.send-pr.rc?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> I'm aware of the Ceri's testing of GNATS 4, but don't know how far that
> got, hence the question instead of a pr with a patch.

It's still ongoing; there's a project page (of sorts) at
http://www.FreeBSD.org/projects/gnats4/ which gives details on where
we're stalled at the moment (although I have remembered some updates
that need making to the plan).

> Would a patch for send-pr adding support for defaults handling using
> an rc file be welcome? If so, should I target send-pr as is in our tree,
> the one from the 4.0 tarball, or upstream cvs?

I'd certainly be interested in looking at it.  At the moment my plan to
upgrade is entirely {hub,www,freefall}.FreeBSD.org based - there seems
to be no pressing need to upgrade the distributed send-pr, so I'd target
the in-tree send-pr.  If it should turn out that a client-side upgrade
is worth the effort then we can bring the patches forward (I had to do
the same for our local edit-pr hacks).

> I'm growing tired of fixing several fields in every pr I'm submitting,
> and don't want to introduce local hacks to send-pr as I would surely
> have to recreate them with every installworld on each of my boxes thanks
> to my bad memory.

Sounds like something that would be widely appreciated.

Thanks,

Ceri
--

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAfRRHocfcwTS3JF8RAvFwAJ0Q94ydR/g2dnkHapQv2XDKMRIfWgCfYalP
YZD+4SZ8nkjjYPCu0Zeng/A=
=c7I/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----