[Bug 272120] touch(1) -r modifies file's birthtime
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]/bugzilla/> |
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272120 --- Comment #6 from Simon Tettmar <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #5) > I don't quite see why these timestamps should be interconnected at all. Yes, I take your point and am somewhat torn on this subject. I have a small addition to the man page that I was going to submit as a PR. This simply notes this behaviour and I think would be non-controversial and helpful if added. But beyond that I think this behaviour probably should be addressed. I am trying to think if anything would rely upon the birth adjusting to match an earlier modification date ( which seems unlikely ). Going forwards, I think I might submit the PR for the small documentation change and then investigate further what is required to allow the modification date to be changed ( without necessarily adjusting the birth date ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.