Re: Unified BSD?
Johnny Billquist <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.netbsd.general,gmane.os.openbsd.misc,gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.user,gmane.os.freebsd.chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Actually, according to what we are tracking at http://bsdstats.org, there are currently *8*: >> >> PC-BSD >> FreeBSD >> PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD) >> DesktopBSD >> OpenBSD >> NetBSD >> DragonflyBSD >> MidnightBSD >> > > Tracking something like DesktopBSD which doesn't exist for quite a > long time make statistics not much useful. MidnightBSD seems to be > same case as last activy on mailing list last year in May, forums > doesn't working at all so we are still on 4 core BSDs > (Open/Net/Free/Dfly). I find it rather meaningless as a tracking tool for BSD in general. There is no way something like 2BSD would ever appear there, no matter how many systems were installed. And I also do happen to consider OS-X to be a BSD system. :-) Johnny > >> >> On 2012-11-16, at 12:30 AM, Alfred Perlstein <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 11/13/12 2:45 AM, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Joost van de Griek wrote: >>>>> On 12 Nov 2012, at 21:37 , Robin Björklin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four largest BSD variants out there, take the best bits and pieces out of each and create a Unified BSD? >>>>> >>>>> You'd end up creating a fifth. >>>> At least a sixth, IIRC. You left out MirBSD from your distribution list