Re: Unified BSD?
Hub- FreeBSD <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.openbsd.misc,gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.user,gmane.os.netbsd.general,gmane.os.freebsd.chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2012-11-16, at 6:42 AM, Erich Dollansky <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:52:48 +0100 > Johnny Billquist <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Actually, according to what we are tracking at >>>> http://bsdstats.org, there are currently *8*: >>>> >>>> PC-BSD >>>> FreeBSD >>>> PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD) >>>> DesktopBSD >>>> OpenBSD >>>> NetBSD >>>> DragonflyBSD >>>> MidnightBSD >>>> >>> >>> Tracking something like DesktopBSD which doesn't exist for quite a >>> long time make statistics not much useful. MidnightBSD seems to be >>> same case as last activy on mailing list last year in May, forums >>> doesn't working at all so we are still on 4 core BSDs >>> (Open/Net/Free/Dfly). >> >> I find it rather meaningless as a tracking tool for BSD in general. >> There is no way something like 2BSD would ever appear there, no >> matter how many systems were installed. > > the number of FreeBSD installations for Indonesia seem also very, very > low. We would have 20% of the installation base then. Its a purely opt-in system, excepf for PC-BSD, which has theirs as an opt-out when you install the OS … that is why its numbers are so much higher then everyone else …