RE: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:52:39 -0400 > CC: [email protected] > > Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <[email protected]> writes: > > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? > >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0300 > >> > >> Is written in OpenBSD FAQ:"One important difference between OpenBSD > >> and many other operating systems is the documentation. OpenBSD > >> developers take great pride in the system man pages. The man pages > >> are the authoritative source of OpenBSD documentation -- not this > >> FAQ, not third-party independently maintained pages, not "HOWTO"s, > >> etc. " > >> To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? > > > > because no one responds? > > I see no reason to disagree with OpenBSD's FAQ answer. > I would give the same answer for FreeBSD, > although maybe not quite as strongly. > _______________________________________________ You understand Portuguese of Brazil ?If no, the that made to understand? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"