TeraCopy can be used to copy files even when the source harddisk has bad sectors (confirmed)
Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming <[email protected]> Sat, 03 Jan 2026 05:29:56 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <PlVweCxEsx0pPjYcH58jCcDPzYJAT8oANKS2ncEISXP7bdHPBDrdFK3ZwGWDOLr-EUisD000WM567Ex0PFYcALDYKVLO-p_nKTyFyqycyAc=@protonmail.com> |
Subject: TeraCopy can be used to copy files even when the source harddisk h= as bad sectors (confirmed) Good day from Singapore, Recently I have THREE (3) units of Western Digital WD My Passport 4 TB USB = portable harddisks (model: WD40NDZW-11BCVS1) which developed bad sectors. A= ccording to Reddit and other forums (reported by ChatGPT), many many many u= sers reported Western Digital 4 TB USB portable harddisks developed bad sec= tors after a short period of use or have high failure rates. According to C= hatGPT, Seagate harddisks have an even higher failure rate compared to West= ern Digital harddisks. According to ChatGPT, internal SATA harddisks and NA= S harddisks have a much higher reliability than USB portable harddisks. ChatGPT artificial intelligence (AI) told me TeraCopy can be used to copy f= iles even when the source harddisk has bad sectors, while Windows File Expl= orer will stall or hang forever when it encounters files with bad sectors. = TeraCopy can be configured to skip files with bad sectors or corruption ins= tead of hanging there forever like Windows File Explorer. Unfortunately, I = didn't come across this configuration option in TeraCopy. Maybe I need to b= uy the Pro licensed copy of TeraCopy. Last night on 2nd Jan 2026 Friday, I have downloaded and installed TeraCopy= 3.17 from Microsoft Store on my Windows 11 home desktop computer. At about/approximately 10.53 PM on 2nd Jan 2026 Friday, I started/initiated= TeraCopy copy operation. By this time, TeraCopy was at 2.0% copying. My objective is to copy 3.56 TB of data from one unit of Western Digital 4 = TB USB portable harddisk to another unit of Western Digital 4 TB USB portab= le harddisk, over USB 3.0 link. USB 3.0 has a theoretical file transfer spe= ed of 5 Gbps, as opposed to 1 Gbps for Gigabit Networking. After waiting for 14 hours 28 minutes, TeraCopy has finally managed to copy= 3.56 TB of data from one unit of Western Digital 4 TB USB portable harddis= k to another unit of Western Digital 4 TB USB portable harddisk, over USB 3= .0 link. At 1.11 PM on 3rd Jan 2026 Saturday, TeraCopy copy operation has finally co= mpleted. Yes, it took TeraCopy 14 hours 28 minutes to copy 3.56 TB of data over USB = 3.0 link (5 Gbps). For Gigabit Networking of 1 Gbps, it would even be sever= al times slower. Unless you have 2.5 Gbps or 10 Gbps Gigabit Networking. If it was 7 TB of data, I don't know how many hours it will take. Basically= you just sit there and wait for super long hours and do nothing. Just star= ing into blank space. According to ChatGPT, if TeraCopy couldn't do it, Linux ddrescue will do th= e job. ddrescue is for Advanced sector-level recovery. FreeBSD also support= s ddrescue. Indeed, I have confirmed that TeraCopy can be used to copy files even when = the source harddisk has bad sectors, without stalling or hanging there fore= ver. Thank you. Regards, Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming Extremely Democratic People's Republic of Singapore 3rd Jan 2026 Saturday 1.23 PM Singapore Time