Re: December 2025 stabilization week

Mark Johnston <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.current
Message-ID <aV7TmgFqbsQGc0OM@nuc>
On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 10:43:55AM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote:
> On 06/01/26 15:26, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 10:00:40AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > T> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 01:00:17AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > T> T> This is an automated email to inform you that the December 2025 stabilization week
> > T> T> started with FreeBSD/main at main-n282678-88b04633c29e, which was tagged as
> > T> T> main-stabweek-2025-Dec.
> > T>
> > T> Due to lack of human and computational resources at Netflix during the
> > T> holiday period, we are unable to make our regular A/B testing in a timely
> > T> manner.
> > 
> > Late update on the December stabweek.  The performance A/B testing at
> > Netflix discovered two performance regressions both related to traffic distribution
> > on a lagg(4).  This was fixed by two commits:
> > 
> > - ac1cd655f647 (applies to Intel NICs supported by ixl(4))
> > - 21865c970888 (applies to all)
> > 
> > Also, a panicing regression in ipfw was reported.  If you try to add a rule
> > with 'log' keyword and without a rule number (autonumbered), the kernel would
> > panic.  There is a temporary patch attached to the email:
> > 
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2025-December/009754.txt
> > 
> > There is no yet patch in main addressing this problem.
> > 
> > Also, there is a report of a kernel panic in in6_selecthlim().  While the
> > problem is known for a long time, but very likely with the December
> > snapshot the race became easier to hit.
> > 
> > Both panics are related to my changes, and I'm working on addressing them
> > before the January stabweek.
> > 
> 
> I've missed the December email but I had this regression [1] on my Thinkpad
> E14 laptop.  Mark attempted to fix it at that point but it didn't work as
> expected and I didn't hear anything from David.
> 
> I keep running a modified GENERIC-NODEBUG kernel without tpm device.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291067

Indeed, I propose simply removing the driver from amd64 kernels for now:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54587
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.