Re: we should enable RFC7217 by default

Pouria Mousavizadeh Tehrani <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.current
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 1/27/26 4:56 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> In a server environment, administrators typically assign static IPv6 
> addresses manually and do not use the EUI-64 method.
To add a note, administrators usually avoid *using* EUI-64 addresses for 
production, especially for their DNS records.
However, they often have an EUI-64 address because having default routes 
and other parameters automatically configured by accept_rtadv is convenient.
That's why I believe there will be an impact on servers. however, as you 
said, it's not an issue here.

At least, we use accept_rtadv in our production AND people typically 
configure their rtadvd with the autonomous bit. So this results in 
having EUI-64 addresses on the servers, which may be used in source 
selection.

I would like to kindly request @madpilot to create this patch for 
review, including a note in the UPDATING file, if everyone is in agreement.

-- 
Pouria
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQSqt7cppfvJ816gj0lUwVnUeMwagAUCaXkrAwAKCRBUwVnUeMwa
gNWtAQCKciMDxgTpUzzUegx877ZSklETCcuEACKKKsb84Mqh7QEA7JNHyn8AICBU
GUn/AchR+HF01WuCHQO4ZlDAu+EsLAY=
=0jPz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.