Re: we should enable RFC7217 by default
Pouria Mousavizadeh Tehrani <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.current |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/27/26 4:56 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > In a server environment, administrators typically assign static IPv6 > addresses manually and do not use the EUI-64 method. To add a note, administrators usually avoid *using* EUI-64 addresses for production, especially for their DNS records. However, they often have an EUI-64 address because having default routes and other parameters automatically configured by accept_rtadv is convenient. That's why I believe there will be an impact on servers. however, as you said, it's not an issue here. At least, we use accept_rtadv in our production AND people typically configure their rtadvd with the autonomous bit. So this results in having EUI-64 addresses on the servers, which may be used in source selection. I would like to kindly request @madpilot to create this patch for review, including a note in the UPDATING file, if everyone is in agreement. -- Pouria
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQSqt7cppfvJ816gj0lUwVnUeMwagAUCaXkrAwAKCRBUwVnUeMwa gNWtAQCKciMDxgTpUzzUegx877ZSklETCcuEACKKKsb84Mqh7QEA7JNHyn8AICBU GUn/AchR+HF01WuCHQO4ZlDAu+EsLAY= =0jPz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----