Re: we should enable RFC7217 by default

Pouria Mousavizadeh Tehrani <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.current
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On 1/28/26 1:30 AM, Marek Zarychta wrote:
> In one of the messages in this thread, you 
> mentioned consensus, there will never be full consensus, which is 
> perfectly fine, but the discussion has certainly raised interest in this 
> subject.
Exactly.
The ideal should be rough consensus (rfc7282), which is slow but works 
perfectly.

-- 
Pouria
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQSqt7cppfvJ816gj0lUwVnUeMwagAUCaXlDzgAKCRBUwVnUeMwa
gEMVAQCJoJcZHQeMF1JoMoFKtklvCvXI1gv3fP92CyU9Gi/hGgD/aGPj7AUDvlhl
SkxrKvIYTX4OqRotoXMvHXo0dy7t4As=
=tlrC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.