Is it expected that tests/sys/kqueue/libkqueue/Makefile and tests/oclo/Makefile should use PLAIN_TESTS_C= instead of using += ?
Mark Millard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.current |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I see: /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kqueue/libkqueue/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C= kqueue_test /usr/main-src/tests/oclo/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C= oclo oclo_errors ocloexec_verify But the rest use += : # grep -r 'PLAIN_TESTS_C.*=' /usr/main-src/tests/ /usr/main-src/tests/sys/aio/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= aio_kqueue_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/aio/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= lio_kqueue_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kqueue/libkqueue/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C= kqueue_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/netmap/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= ctrl-api-test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/file/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= ftruncate_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/file/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= newfileops_on_fork_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= subr_unit_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/pipe/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= big_pipe_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/pipe/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= pipe_fstat_bug_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/pipe/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= pipe_ino_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/pipe/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= pipe_overcommit1_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/pipe/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= pipe_overcommit2_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/pipe/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= pipe_reverse2_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/pipe/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= pipe_reverse_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/pipe/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= pipe_wraparound_test /usr/main-src/tests/sys/kern/tty/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= tiocnotty /usr/main-src/tests/sys/fifo/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= fifo_create /usr/main-src/tests/sys/fifo/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= fifo_io /usr/main-src/tests/sys/fifo/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= fifo_misc /usr/main-src/tests/sys/fifo/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C+= fifo_open /usr/main-src/tests/oclo/Makefile:PLAIN_TESTS_C= oclo oclo_errors ocloexec_verify (Not that the above contributes to my problem, but I noticed this while trying to figure out why my armv7 builds fail but my aarch64 builds work. The difference being armv7 is not even trying to build tests/sys/kern/tty/tiocnotty but its install is trying to install it. aarch64 both builds it and installs it.) -- === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com