Re: OpenAFS port

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Boris Samorodov <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Derrick Brashear" <[email protected]> writes:
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Boris Samorodov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> "Derrick Brashear" <[email protected]> writes:
> >>
> >> > I don't believe there are conflicts between client objects, and server
> >> > objects. An independent client and server port should be possible.
> >>
> >> They both should install configuration files. Hence, they conflict
> >> here.
> >
> > Server and client use separate configuration, unless it's stuff *you
> added*,
> > and then it's a choice you made, OpenAFS itself doesn't have that issue.
> In
> > the old transarc-style universe, /usr/afs/etc versus /usr/vice/etc
>
> FreeBSD uses /usr/local/etc for all third-party configuration files,
> Both for servers and clients. So at least CellServDB and ThisCell
> should be dealed/installed by both.
>

That's bad. Actually, it's horrible. It means you force a server to be in
the same AFS cell as a client, whereas it's valid and I have done a client
in one cell as a server in another.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-afs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"