Re: head -r365677 and later do not have the xhci related DMA problem fixed
Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <JTSsaCfyfQICpQuYOx_aY-35TQTxCtQbI3L_t1o70kdtk-MZrrJ06WuluBwhYS5BQ58Apdet1XTP3u79WZYGUj8L2BjY_owAkoVLMN8IXVU=@protonmail.com> |
Yes: aren’t you dependent on the unrelated D25219 to fix uefi? The DMA patch I submitted is at the PCI-e level; I haven’t touched xhci. Sorry for confusion! — RHC. On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 22:30, Klaus Cucinauomo via freebsd-arm <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 24.09.2020 um 21:04 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <[email protected]>: >> >> >> This puts the sytem after then head -r365677 check in of the >> attempted DMA fix that involved restricting the xhci DMA range to >> 1 GiByte. >> >> I've tested head -r363932 under uefi/ACPI v1.20 …... > > Hi Mark, > > `hope we talk about the same context: > The 1GB DMA range fix from Rob in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344 <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26344> > has NOTHING to do with UEFI/ACPI. > It addresses the pcie-driver for fdt(u-boot). > While there is probably some inheritances in the USB/pcie-chain: > pcie is NOT exposed to the OS by rpi4Uefi-dev. > > Regards > > Klaus > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"