Re: RPi4B: emmc2bus dma-range handling does not track the boot-time-FDT (u-boot based booting)
Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2020-Oct-8, at 06:27, Klaus Cucinauomo <maciphone2 at googlemail.com> wrote: >> Am 08.10.2020 um 11:01 schrieb Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <[email protected]>: >> >> >> The old u-boot/DTB combination in use does not have emmc2bus. >> And, even if it did, FreeBSD would not use ………. > > … and the new 2020.10- combinations will even be more annoying… > While I meanwhile e.g. could boot the 4GB off of xhci, it hangs in DeviceTree, > Depending on GUESSED ;-) combinations and DeviceTree-patches in src . > There have to be necessary adjustments which are even not yet upstreamed in u-boot > (depending on hw-revisions)…and so on ... > I doubt that anyone really will take explicitly time consuming care of all that annoying RPI4-crap. > I don't see any other way than targeting minimum 1 developer(better more) ONLY to the RPI-platform > for a time period… other than leaving it crappy as is and to be happy that it nevertheless > is a working fbsd-gadget :-) Summary of probable-cause finding: u-boot 2020.10 is expecting: compatible = "brcm,generic-xhci" instead of what seems to be in files that are in use by FreeBSD: compatible = "generic-xhci" (I've no clue what all the other differences in the .dtb file contents might be.) The details of what I learned that reached that status . . . I updated my ports environment on a RPi4 to build the final 2020.10 u-boot for the RPi4. I then built it and replaced the u-boot.bin on the microsd card that I boot with via the FreeBSD kernel being from that microsd card but later stages being from the USB3 SSD. I did not update anything else. So: still an older .dtb file. That 8 GiByte RPi4B context booted just fine. I then rebooted and had it stop in u-boot and looked around just a little bit. U-Boot 2020.10 (Oct 09 2020 - 00:51:29 +0000) DRAM: 7.9 GiB RPI 4 Model B (0xd03114) MMC: mmc@7e300000: 1, emmc2@7e340000: 0 Loading Environment from FAT... In: serial Out: vidconsole Err: vidconsole Net: eth0: ethernet@7d580000 PCIe BRCM: link up, 5.0 Gbps x1 (SSC) starting USB... Bus xhci_pci: probe failed, error -110 No working controllers found Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 So it reproted the problem above. Yet . . . U-Boot> pci 0 Scanning PCI devices on bus 0 BusDevFun VendorId DeviceId Device Class Sub-Class _____________________________________________________________ 00.00.00 0x14e4 0x2711 Bridge device 0x04 U-Boot> pci 1 Scanning PCI devices on bus 1 BusDevFun VendorId DeviceId Device Class Sub-Class _____________________________________________________________ 01.00.00 0x1106 0x3483 Serial bus controller 0x03 So it does see the xHCI on the pci bus despite the "Bus xhci_pci: probe failed, error -110". -110 looks to be -ETIMEDOUT . Looking at the v2020.10/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c source code shows that the xhci_pci driver has: . . . static const struct udevice_id xhci_pci_ids[] = { { .compatible = "xhci-pci" }, { } }; U_BOOT_DRIVER(xhci_pci) = { .name = "xhci_pci", .id = UCLASS_USB, .probe = xhci_pci_probe, .remove = xhci_deregister, .of_match = xhci_pci_ids, .ops = &xhci_usb_ops, .platdata_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct usb_platdata), .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct xhci_ctrl), .flags = DM_FLAG_ALLOC_PRIV_DMA, }; static struct pci_device_id xhci_pci_supported[] = { { PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_XHCI, ~0) }, {}, }; U_BOOT_PCI_DEVICE(xhci_pci, xhci_pci_supported); (It looks like the above driver is used as the default driver if no explicit match is found. It has been around for years.) But, in the past when I showed the likes of fdt print / or translation to a .dts file, it did not have "xhci-pci" in compatible but had "generic-xhci" instead, such as: xhci@7e9c0000 { compatible = "generic-xhci"; status = "disabled"; reg = <0x00000000 0x7e9c0000 0x00000000 0x00100000>; interrupts = <0x00000000 0x000000b0 0x00000004>; phandle = <0x000000d3>; }; For reference, for FreeBSD there is: # grep -ri "xhci-pci" /usr/src/sys/ | more # grep -ri "generic-xhci" /usr/src/sys/ | more /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/controller/generic_xhci_fdt.c: {"generic-xhci", true}, /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm/bcm-nsp.dtsi: compatible = "generic-xhci"; /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm/bcm5301x.dtsi: compatible = "generic-xhci"; /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/broadcom/stingray/stingray-usb.dtsi: compatible = "generic-xhci"; /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/broadcom/stingray/stingray-usb.dtsi: compatible = "generic-xhci"; /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/marvell/armada-37xx.dtsi: "generic-xhci"; /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/marvell/armada-cp11x.dtsi: "generic-xhci"; /usr/src/sys/gnu/dts/arm64/marvell/armada-cp11x.dtsi: "generic-xhci"; That FreeBSD generic_xhci_fdt.c match is from: static struct ofw_compat_data compat_data[] = { {"marvell,armada-380-xhci", true}, {"marvell,armada3700-xhci", true}, {"marvell,armada-8k-xhci", true}, {"generic-xhci", true}, {NULL, false} }; (End for-reference.) There is another driver in u-boot 2020.10, one that does mention "generic-" for xhci in drivers/usb/host/xhci-brcm.c : static const struct udevice_id xhci_brcm_ids[] = { { .compatible = "brcm,generic-xhci" }, { } }; U_BOOT_DRIVER(usb_xhci) = { .name = "xhci_brcm", .id = UCLASS_USB, .probe = xhci_brcm_probe, .remove = xhci_brcm_deregister, .ops = &xhci_usb_ops, .of_match = xhci_brcm_ids, .platdata_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct brcm_xhci_platdata), .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct xhci_ctrl), .flags = DM_FLAG_ALLOC_PRIV_DMA, }; It is a new driver as of around 6 months ago and so is likely the one created for the RPi4B context. (Note the usb_xhci vs. xhci_brcm distinct namings of the driver.) The .dtb files that I use for uefi/ACPI booting of FreeBSD and for u-boot based booting of ubuntu 2010.04.1 also use "generic-xhci", no "brcm," invovled. It seems that .dtb files that the u-boot folks expect for the RPi4B are vintages/variations that have compatible listing: "brcm,generic-xhci" . If one finds a .dtb with such, it might be close to what they were testing. With such a file, finding other differences with the .dtb files currently in use with FreeBSD could be done. I hope that the above helps. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"