tmp and tmpfs

tech-lists <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Him

context is rpi4 running very recent -current.

Which is faster/better? /tmp mounted as tmpfs as per default on rpi2/3/4, or /tmp as zfs on a usb3-connected spinning rust hd? I understand that if tmpfs fills up, it'll use swap. Faster/slower than /tmp on zfs?

Spinning rust is also where the swap partition lives.

thanks
-- 
J.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=y6tU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.