Re: tmp and tmpfs
Robert Crowston via freebsd-arm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <hUVMLjJ0YusVdfQ01Rcvi_o_h6EGt3TIP57pfF5nS2qkobEr7K9LZmhVz-Vq6BYx5pjtpkjgJBTRBPjdY0S-tA6ji48DdNY7OWOco51WOqo=@protonmail.com> |
It’ll be significantly faster in memory, it depends if you want to spare the ram. How many temporary files do you have? On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 15:19, tech-lists <[email protected]> wrote: > Him > > context is rpi4 running very recent -current. > > Which is faster/better? /tmp mounted as tmpfs as per default on rpi2/3/4, or /tmp as zfs on a usb3-connected spinning rust hd? I understand that if tmpfs fills up, it'll use swap. Faster/slower than /tmp on zfs? > > Spinning rust is also where the swap partition lives. > > thanks > -- > J. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"