Re: tmp and tmpfs
tech-lists <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 07:25:19AM +0000, Robert Crowston wrote: >Itâll be significantly faster in memory, it depends if you want to >spare the ram. > >How many temporary files do you have? Hi, I'm not sure ;) I'm not even sure how much space I'll need. Think I'll just have to test and see. The pi4 isn't used for xorg at all, though things like mutt and imapsync might use tmp a lot. On a desktop running kf5-plasma/firefox and all the trimmings, tmp stands at 8.1GB and the system was rebooted only a couple days ago. The pi4 has just finished building world/kernel and tmp is 282k. Maybe set it to 1GB. I was wondering really if memory pressure pushes this to swap, if there would be slowdown more significant overall than if /tmp was just on zfs -- J.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl+1rLAACgkQs8o7QhFz NAWo8g/+OdMAmOXrL86q/wLwL1IXYGKrNHvJbIUwhWLC7vgeJajNYb8VI1TnoaNq mE18MLsKpBniTiW5+TdXobEZKnLkcEDQ+QwIdxoR4iw9TRh7TznZYqi1LiEz1s8f upIivEOYTWxxm8hyTq3GIBjc5zvHEsLKvbI6V9hqzeXwIhr1uvXH9NrHjOXz0J9K 2ZTNO/zfqmL8CN/gXLkLDDoBvZVmDqG6aFLTRZCLj1VBdNwNOy+G+cbZ+CXlU/Th ZlV9ixVtpvAF60BYCW2lOPylr5umzQlNUn5GquaeZ4izCqrC+7/dDFzedsBwLM4M zX6F2XLkkmKmAcuFPO+cFZQZlEy9cI+dtNg+LWIpMRqvQwe3awEHG10Dn6MTCI7V LcfdqgsarutziAf2SZGKhDf4arWxGcd+nu0OZzacdKIFw6tR4Nr8bYgNa0sKEh8S wo6JCTfBOyQzvnvX+VfExFHP5c7F8N1IWVLufEkTRCNiGhVahiUkIpY9Y9Cr0Ztg qHaC+2n8LF8Ilce+3efp7jT+FejPEYvEQJ0vSoh9P2UohabGGgFY6etSeyNv8mBS FvAVsZ9iw3Y4SDXoYpBgiYiADbv1z4d/QNmh2D+M8QAD+A1s9WNxGeoeuOzQOZ0n gCreWtfjqwqRZ4a/UvqQha43x2oz2A/zA83ImM5j4pQXejRYd8U= =Lv2f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----