Re: ThunderX Panic after r368370
Marcel Flores <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Dec 6, 2020, at 4:59 PM, Marcel Flores <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Dec 6, 2020, at 3:51 AM, Michal Meloun <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 06.12.2020 10:47, Mark Millard wrote: >>> On 2020-Dec-6, at 00:17, Michal Meloun <meloun.michal at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 06.12.2020 3:21, Marcel Flores wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> Looks like the ThunderX started panicking at boot after r368370: >>>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS368370 >>>>> From a verbose boot, it looks like it bails in gic0 redistributor setup(?): >>>>> gic0: CPU29 Re-Distributor woke up >>>>> gic0: CPU24 enabled CPU interface via system registers >>>>> gic0: CPU17 enabled CPU interface via system registers >>>>> gic0: CPU29 enabled CPU interface via system registers >>>>> done >>>>> Full Verbose boot: >>>>> https://gist.github.com/mesflores/f026122495c8494d041bce04d30b15bb >>>>> I'm not really familiar with the details of the commit, but happy to test >>>>> anything if anyone has any ideas. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Marcel >>>> are you able to get crashdump and do backtrace? >>>> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html#kerneldebug-obtain >>>> and >>>> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html >>>> If not, I'll make some debug patch. >>>> >>>> It's weird, even though GIC is potentially affected by my patch, in this case the cpuid numbering was not changed. >>> (I've no access to a ThunderX. I just looked for my own curiosity. >>> Sorry if this is obvious and so is noise.) >>> When I looked at the code it appeared to be the last "->" in >>> the following that was dereferencing the nullptr value (via [x8] >>> in assembler notation): >>> static uint64_t >>> its_cmd_prepare(struct its_cmd *cmd, struct its_cmd_desc *desc) >>> { >>> uint64_t target; >>> uint8_t cmd_type; >>> u_int size; >>> cmd_type = desc->cmd_type; >>> target = ITS_TARGET_NONE; >>> switch (cmd_type) { >>> case ITS_CMD_MOVI: /* Move interrupt ID to another collection */ >>> target = desc->cmd_desc_movi.col->col_target; >>> . . . >>> In other words: it appeared to me that the above desc->cmd_desc_movi.col >>> evaluated as 0 when used in what was reported. >> This is very probably right analysis. But problem is that cmd_desc_movi.col should not be NULL, is initialized in its_cmd_movi from sc->sc_its_cols which should be allocated in gicv3_its_attach(). >> >> >> Marcel, can you, please also try this debug patch? >> https://github.com/strejda/freebsd/commit/a25ed736644b05672e3e813891af213c280daac3 >> Unfortunately, I have only single socket board with GIv3, Honeycomb, but it still boots fine. >> >> Thanks, Michal > > Debug patch output here (I also switched from GENERIC-NODEBUG to GENERIC): > > https://gist.github.com/mesflores/27bd1cca45b04e5b938166c9f1f79a04 > > Having a little trouble getting the crashdump saved, but will update if I can sort it out. > > -m Here’s the debug build output when applied to r368369, incase the side-by-side is helpful: https://gist.github.com/mesflores/329a826508dc47a0f9333ab5b6c52116 -m _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"