Re: FreeBSD arm64 on EC2 requires boot1.efifat
Nathan Whitehorn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/15/21 2:58 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:30 PM Michael Sierchio <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> For both 12-STABLE and 13-RC2 I have been successful in creating working >> instances in AWS EC2 only with boot1.efifat – which does not appear to be >> included in base.txz >> > No. It's not needed. It has been retired. > > >> If anyone has succeeded with boot1.efi, I stand ready to be enlightened. >> > The ESP is just a FAT filesystem. > > newfs_msdos /dev/XX > mount -t msdos /dev/XX /mnt > mkdir /mnt/efi/boot > cp /boot/boot1.efi /mnt/efi/boot/bootx64.efi > > I've added this to the release notes recently... And the installer (and VM images) do this internally now. -Nathan >> Thanks! >> >> – M >> >> -- >> >> "Well," Brahmā said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no >> wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred." >> >> - The Mahābhārata >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" >> > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"