Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64?
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:12:47 +0300 Stefan Parvu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > `have otherRK3399 with M.2-slot(Rock960(no more available on the market) while direct nvme -connection-support by > > u-boot&FreeBSD is quite complicate , to say it kindly( Rock960 boots from nvme but hangs @ mountroot> (nvme, nda, nvd seem to have problems) . By the way, I doubt that RK3399 is faster than RPI4(tested by build world). > > powerd doesn?t scale correctly with RK3399 to 1800 for the big of big.LITTLE , so it?s to set manually?.. > > So to summarize: > > these are the SBC supported by FreeBSD: https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm64#Single_Boards <https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm64#Single_Boards> > > I agree part with Ian, RBPI is a mixed bag. Many things are not working (Wifi, BLE) but for our product RBPI 3B/3B+ has been working without a problem outdoor and indoors. > > Is there any hope to see Wifi / BLE working on this board RBPI 3B/4B ? > > Are there any other SBC supported by FreeBSD 13/CURRENT ? A lot, you can consider any Allwinner H5/A64 and RockChip RK3328/RK3399 as supported. Some even have some dedicated image. > Are there any other ARM64 industrial boards (1/2/4GB RAM, RTC, -40C - 80C) supported by FreeBSD ? You might want to look at IMX8 boards. Allwinner, RockChip and RPI aren't made for industrial grade. > Is NetBSD a better choice than FreeBSD for ARM64 SBC ? Better choice for what ? > Thanks, > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" -- Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"