Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64?
Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2021-Mar-30, at 16:32, Ian Lepore <ian at freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 22:52 +0000, Dan Kotowski wrote: >>> `guess SFP+ would need more special driver-attention ... >>> from quick reading around the web I guess the DPAA2 also needs a >>> closed source binary blob. >> >> So this actually comes from NXP, not SolidRun. Linux already has >> some/most of what's needed, and the license is GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3- >> Clause so there's hope, but I haven't heard a peep from NXP and >> SolidRun doesn't really have the manpower to port to FreeBSD >> themselves. >> >> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/ > > That's actually very good news. If it's dual-licensed it can be > included in freebsd without any drama. Still needs porting work, or > maybe it could run using the linuxkpi stuff? > The files there are a mix: a few list just: # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only or: # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 or: // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 or: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ ( Kconfig Makefile dpaa2-ptp.[ch] dprtc-cmd.h dprtc.[ch] ) The others (most) list: // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) or: /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) */ The Copyrights seem to be Freescale Semiconductor Inc. and/or NXP when documented on a file. May be they would be willing to add the BSD-3-Clause where it is missing? === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"