Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64?
Marcel Flores <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Apr 1, 2021, at 3:51 AM, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-arm <[email protected]> wrote: > > Practically speaking, supposing I'd like the equivalent of an > entry-level server that is not a spacerocket (80 cores...) but not a > raspberry with the drives tapes to the raw board, is there anything > around? I have no complaints about the ThunderX: plenty of cores, easy to spec with ram and storage, even the fancy NIC works without any issue (once you sort out the slightly circuitous configuration). I’ve been tracking -CURRENT for a couple of years now with very few issues. Its power draw is reasonable and its modest cooling needs keep it well below spacerocket levels. Probably the price-per-performance formula doesn’t really pan out great at this point, but as you point out, the space between the RPI and say the eMAG is a little thin. -Marcel _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"