Re: Is it deliberate that sysutils/u-boot-tools is not updated when u-boot-master (and company) progress?
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:38:58 -0700 Mark Millard via freebsd-arm <[email protected]> wrote: > sysutils/u-boot-tools is still back at 2020.07 : > > Commit message (Expand) Author Age Files Lines > * Remove # $FreeBSD$ from Makefiles. Mathieu Arnold 34 hours 1 -1/+0 > * u-boot: Update to 2020.07 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-07-08 3 -14/+4 > . . . > > But there have been 2020.10 and 2021.04 updates since then: > > Commit message (Expand) Author Age Files Lines > * sysutils/u-boot-*: Update to 2021.04 Emmanuel Vadot 16 hours 2 -5/+6 > . . . > * sysutils/u-boot-*: Update to 2020.10 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-11-07 3 -4/+35 > . . . > * u-boot: Update to 2020.07 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-07-08 3 -34/+5 > > I'll note that u-boot-master has: > > BUILD_DEPENDS+= gsed:textproc/gsed \ > . . . > mkimage:sysutils/u-boot-tools \ > . . . > > and u-boot-tools has: > > DISTVERSION= 2020.07 > > This may well be just fine, such as if using somewhat older versions > of u-boot-tools has historically been more stable despite version > mismatches. But I figured I'd ask: > > Is the use of the older u-boot-tools deliberate? > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > ( dsl-only.net went > away in early 2018-Mar) Most of the time it's not deliberate as it's just that I forgot this port. This time is was deliberate as some new tools fails to compile and I didn't had time to look deeper for now. -- Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"