Re: Oversimplification

George Mitchell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/3/21 2:20 AM, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-arm wrote:
> On 2021-May-30 17:49:01 -0400, George Mitchell <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>> I've never been shy about oversimplifying complex questions, so here
>> goes: What's the ARM system that presents the least hassle to a
>> prospective FreeBSD user?  Here's what I mean by low hassle:
>>
>> 1. Widely available.
>> 2. Runs some standard FreeBSD image with minimal (or no) tweaking.
>> 3. I suspect ARM64 means less hassle than ARM32.
>> 4. Friendly to an external high-speed (at least USB 3; possibly SATA?)
>>     disk.
>> 5. Hopefully 8GB on-board memory, though 4GB is probably okay if high
>>     speed swapping is available (see point 4).
>> 6. Affordable, but not cheap.
> 
> I'll second Milan's followup.  I have a 4GB RockPro64 with the
> dual-SATA PCIe card and am quite happy with it.  It also supports
> both USB-3 and USB-C, though I haven't experimented with either.
> 
> Note that the WiFi/Bluetooth module for the RockPro64 uses SDIO,
> and the combination isn't yet supported by FreeBSD.
> 
> I also have a BananaPi M1, which has an integral SATA port but I've
> never managed to get the SATA to work.
> 
Thanks for the additional data point!                    -- George
OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, 840 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.