Re: 14-CURRENT Kernel Panic due to USB hub?

Andrew Turner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Can you create a bug for this in bugzilla so we can keep track of it?

Andrew

> On 21 Nov 2021, at 07:18, Daniel Morante via freebsd-arm <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Here's the bt:
> 
> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0 (disconnected)
> uhub5: at uhub0, port 1, addr 1 (disconnected)
> uhub5: detached
> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0
> uhub5 numa-domain 0 on uhub0
> uhub5: <Interrupt In Interface> on usbus0
> uhub5: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0 (disconnected)
> uhub5: at uhub0, port 1, addr 1 (disconnected)
> uhub5: detached
> panic: data abort with spinlock held
> cpuid = 108
> time = 1637478997
> KDB: stack backtrace:
> db_trace_self() at db_trace_self
> KDB: enter: panic
> [ thread pid 11 tid 100111 ]
> Stopped at      kdb_enter+0x44: undefined       f901411f
> db> bt
> Tracing pid 11 tid 100111 td 0xffffa00005619580
> db_trace_self() at db_trace_self
> db>
> 
> On 11/12/2021 5:52 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On 11/12/21 00:43, Daniel Morante via freebsd-arm wrote:
>>> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0 (disconnected)
>>> uhub5: at uhub0, port 1, addr 1 (disconnected)
>>> uhub5: detached
>>> ugen0.2: <Generic 4-Port USB 3.0 Hub> at usbus0
>>> uhub5 numa-domain 0 on uhub0
>>> uhub5: <Interrupt In Interface> on usbus0
>>> uhub5: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered
>>> 
>>> I suspect these problems are caused by the above detaching/reattaching.
>> 
>> Can you type "bt" in the panic prompt?
>> 
>> --HPS
>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.