It looks like devel/aarch64-none-elf-gcc and other aarch64 */gcc* 's suffer from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723

Mark Millard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In doing some experiments, it looks like I've run into:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723

which had fixes applied to gcc9 , gcc10, and gcc11 in very
late 2021-July into Aug (all after the most recent tagged
release). gcc8 was already out of support or it would have
had a commit too. ( aarch64-none-elf-gcc is currently at
8.4.0 .)

The specific issue is that for compiles with -march=armv8-a+crc
specified the result is as if the +crc had not been specified.
In my context:

{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:37: Error: selected processor does not support `crc32b w0,w0,w4'

The description of the fixes starts with:

QUOTE
    A change to the way gas interprets the .fpu directive in binutils-2.34
    means that issuing .fpu will clear any features set by .arch_extension
    that apply to the floating point or simd units.  This unfortunately
    causes problems for more recent versions of the architecture because
    we currently emit .arch, .arch_extension and .fpu directives at
    different times and try to suppress redundant changes.
. . .
END QUOTE

So seeing the problem or not also depends on the vintage of gas
in use, possibly explaining this not having been noticed before.

This was reported separately in:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104439

for 11.2.0 and more and specifically for crc32b messages, but was
classified as a duplicate of the earlier one listed above.

As far as I can tell no tagged gcc release has the fix yet:

releases/gcc-11.2.0 (2021-Jul-27, so close: 29th commit)
releases/gcc-9.4.0  (2021-Jun-01)
releases/gcc-10.3.0 (2021-Apr-08)

This interfere with experimenting with an updated U-Boot for
aarch64.

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.