Re: [package - 130arm64-default][java/openjdk17] Failed for openjdk17-17.0.2+8.1 in configure

ASLR was turned on by default on -CURRENT. All the java ports are 
affected if they are built with a -CURRENT system.

On 08/05/2022 06:14, Greg Lewis wrote:
>
> Is the suggestion to put that into the openjdk17 port Makefile?  I'll 
> look for some documentation on this.
>
> FWIW, the bootstrap just works on the AWS hardware I stand up for 
> aarch64.  Although that is also where I built the bootstrap images.  
> If someone has some different hardware that would be preferable?
>
> -- Greg
>
> On 5/2/22 12:12 AM, Ronald Klop wrote:
>>
>> *Van:* "Mikaël Urankar" <[email protected]>
>> *Datum:* zondag, 1 mei 2022 17:56
>> *Aan:* Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
>> *Onderwerp:* Re: [package - 130arm64-default][java/openjdk17] Failed 
>> for openjdk17-17.0.2+8.1 in configure
>>
>>     On 30/04/2022 15:49, Ronald Klop wrote:
>>     > Hi,
>>     >
>>     > Openjdk17 and openjdk13 are failing on 130arm64.
>>     >
>>     > This started in March, I don't see a bug report in Bugzilla
>>     about it.
>>     > Openjdk17 is a LTS version so it would be nice to have that one
>>     fixed. > Openjdk13 is deprecated so don't bother about that one
>>     but mentioning > is because it might be related.
>>     >
>>     > Below the openjdk17 log.
>>     >
>>     > The build for main-arm64 had the same error: (IPv6:) >
>>     http://ampere2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/main-arm64-default/p62850d28ca57_s651a887f4e/logs/errors/openjdk17-17.0.2+8.1.log
>>     >
>>     > Regards,
>>     > Ronald.
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     It's similar to
>>     https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260187
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing your memory of closed issues!
>>
>> Would the port need something like this?
>>
>> ELF_FEATURES=       noaslr:bootstrap-openjdk17/bin/java
>>
>> Maybe with a conditional on aarch64.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ronald.