Re: VirtualBox
Alex Samorukov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> > > For lack of available info, I naively tried booting the aarch64 disc1 > ISO, which not surprisingly didn't work. Not even sure if this is the > right approach, but it seems like the intuitive one the the average > VirtualBox user. I think it would be ideal if the experience were the > same as for x86. Just try UTM :) Again, VirtualBox is a road to nowhere - it emulates x86 on aarch. Of course, performance will be terrible, as well as emulation quality. KVM just works, and if you need UI - UTM works pretty well for me, at least. And you will get near-native speed, as it is arm64 guest on arm64 host which uses native macOS virtualisation framework.