Re: sys/modules/Makefile and MACHINE_ARCH vs arm64 (in use) vs aarch64 (not in use) VS. man arch; also COMPAT_FREEBSD32_ENABLED use
Warner Losh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm,gmane.os.freebsd.current |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANCZdfoRGUANSqWhhC=OOpEPc8zO3YkChKeqJS_NX6Cqn3_AjA@mail.gmail.com> |
Those all look wrong to me. Warner On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 11:27 AM Mark Millard <[email protected]> wrote: > man arch reports: > > MACHINE MACHINE_CPUARCH MACHINE_ARCH > arm64 aarch64 aarch64 > . . . > arm arm armv6, armv7 > > So I'd not expect arm64 in MACHINE_ARCH . But > sys/modules/Makefile has (from a grep for MACHINE_ARCH): > > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "arm64" > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "arm64" || > ${MACHINE_ARCH:Mpowerpc64*} > > > Another issue may be that COMPAT_FREEBSD32_ENABLED is only > put to use in the Makefile for MACHINE_CPUARCH being i386 > or amd64 : > > .if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "i386" || ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "amd64" > _agp= agp > .if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "i386" || !empty(COMPAT_FREEBSD32_ENABLED) > . . . > > > > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > >