Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)
Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:28:22 +0000 Glen Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:35:39PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000308.html > > [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231019 fb7140b1f928)] > > > > reported (note "RPI"): > > > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 RPI > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 > > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC > > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000310.html > > [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231026 d3a36e4b7459) ] > > > > reported (note "PINE64" without "-LTS" and lack of "RPI"): > > > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64 > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 > > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 > > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC > > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD > > > > > > Last week, RPI succeeded while PINE64 failed. This week, the opposite > occurred. > > Glen > Any logs ? -- Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> <[email protected]>