Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)
Glen Barber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Logboutput forwarded in a separate email. Glen Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity and/or typos. > On Oct 28, 2023, at 12:30 AM, Glen Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > > As I think I have made very clear in the past, no, not publicly. > > The RPI build failed because of some “offset.Inc” file being spammed with null bytes. > > The better question imho, is why does PINE64 now succeede when it has been failing, and if there is any direct correlation between the two. > > Glen > Sent from my phone. > Please excuse my brevity and/or typos. > >> On Oct 28, 2023, at 12:21 AM, Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:28:22 +0000 >> Glen Barber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:35:39PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000308.html >>>>> [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231019 fb7140b1f928)] >>>>> >>>>> reported (note "RPI"): >>>>> >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 RPI >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD >>>>> >>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000310.html >>>>> [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231026 d3a36e4b7459) ] >>>>> >>>>> reported (note "PINE64" without "-LTS" and lack of "RPI"): >>>>> >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64 >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC >>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> Last week, RPI succeeded while PINE64 failed. This week, the opposite >>> occurred. >>> >>> Glen >>> >> >> Any logs ? >> >> -- >> Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >>