Re: Stable/14 dropping ssh connections to FT232 usb-serial adapter

Mark Millard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
So, if I understand correctly, the general structure here is something like:

RPi4B: ssh to RPi2 v1.1 #0 (to invent simple naming).
. . .
RPi2 v1.1 #0: tip ucom (which gets to RPi2 v1.1 #1)
. . .
(Does each RPi2 v1.1 get its own ssh session too? If yes: all from the same RPi4B?)
RPi2 v1.1 #1: tip ucom (which gets to RPi2 v1.1 #2)
. . .
(ssh session to RPi2 v1.1 #N ?)
RPi2 v1.1 #N: tip ucom (which gets to RPi2 v1.1 #0)

(An accurate/complete indication of the sessions/connections
command sequence for the set up could be useful.)

As I understand, you are seeing the ssh session abort, not just a tip
session abort.

An interesting test might be having another ssh session paired with
each one that does a remote tip --but that is not used for any tip
or other activity beyond sitting at a shell prompt. The question for
each paired ssh session would be:

A) Do both ssh sessions of the pair fail/abort at the same time?
B) Does only one? If yes: is it always just the one that had used tip?

So, a comparison/contrast test.

As I remember, there were notes about avoiding special character
sequences from getting special interpretations for ssh. That sort of
thing could be important to both ssh [-e none] and tip [-n] for
testing if that avoids some problems.

I've no clue if "tip -n -v" might report anything interesting around
a failure (via the -v).

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.